As I have probably noted in this space before, I am not a big fan of traveling. This annoys my wife, by the way, but I can’t help it—I just don’t like traveling all that much. Given the choice between a month long all-expense paid journey around the world or a month at home reading books with nothing else to do, I’d probably stay home. (Just probably—maybe, I would go—and if my wife’s expenses were also covered and she heard about the offer, then the probability that I would go would certainly increase.)
But, I do travel vicariously. And recently, I have been to two places:
1. Andes Night /Nocturno Ecuador, by Robert Gibson Z
First off, both the title and the author’s name are a
problem. What is the title of this book? Those four words are listed scattered over the front cover, are listed in that order
without the slash on the spine, and are listed in that order with the slash in
the copyright notice. Second, is the
author’s last name Gibson Z or just Z?
But, to the book itself—I am not sure if I technically read this
or not. The book is almost entirely
pictures—photographs—of (not surprisingly given the title) the Andes at
night. The pictures are gorgeous. Some really nice photography here. There is a page of really goofy pseudo-poetic
prose at the outset (maybe it actually is poetic if you can read the original
Spanish page, but I just read the English translation page (since I can’t read
Spanish, and not, as the Reader might have suspected, due to some misbegotten obsession
with reading original Spanish works in translation)). There is also some really odd prose at the
end about constellations and the moon.
But, nobody gets this book for the prose. The pictures are nice. I enjoyed looking through them—indeed, I have
looked through this book many times since I got it two weeks ago.
However, I am certain my enjoyment of this book is only
partly due to the enjoyment from looking at the pictures. The book was a gift from a student who
graduated in December—she is from Ecuador and she sent the book to me via a friend
and current Mount Holyoke Student who was returning to college this semester. I suspect most of my enjoyment in looking at the
book is the association with my former student.
The pictures are nice.
Several of them have a tent, presumably the photographer’s, out in the middle
of nowhere. I would enjoy camping to in
the middle of nowhere. So, I take back
what I said above. Given the possibility
of having a tent and a stack of books in a remote part of the Andes, I would love
that trip.
2. I also traveled vicariously to Japan. Chris Claremont sent Wolverine there in a
book cleverly entitled Wolverine. The recent Marvel movie about Wolverine was
based on this book (as long as you us the word “based” to mean “in both the book
and the movie Wolverine goes to Japan and there are characters in Japan with the
same names in both the book and the movie”).
Wolverine does not make me
want to visit Japan.
As for the book—it’s OK.
I am not a big fan of Wolverine, the character. He has a great tag line “I am the best there
is at what I do but what I do isn’t very nice.”
His attitude is funny. But his superpowers
are just too much. He automatically
heals—but the rapidity with which he heals seems to vary depending on the needs
of the plot. He has an indestructible skeleton,
so it is impossible to dismember him.
And then there are the retractable claws which can cut through anything like
a hot knife going through butter. In
other words, this guy is pretty much an indestructible fighting machine which can
easily carve up anything. So, how do you
put a character like that into any dangerous situation?—only by having him a) forget
how to use his claws or b) have his healing powers slow down enough so that he
can be knocked out—but then you have the problem of what to do with him when he
is knocked out. OK, so he is a comic
book hero and the whole thing doesn’t make a lot of sense. Maybe I just haven't read enough Wolverine
comic books to find the charm in the character—but that is why I read this book—it
is widely regarded as one of the best of Wolverine and it was just OK. But, I am now puzzled about why I don’t like the
character more—then again, the whole set of X-Men never interested me nearly as
much as the rest of the Marvel pantheon—and again, I am not sure why. Something else about which to ponder.
But back to travel. Why
isn’t the song of the voice inside me set to the rhythm of the wheel? Is this a failing? Should I want to travel more?
An even bigger oddity: in the next six months I am traveling to New York City, Chicago, Palo Alto, Belgium, and Annapolis for assorted things. And that doesn't include any vacation plans with my family.
It is seriously not fair that you get to go on all those great trips and you don't like to travel! What are you doing in Belgium? And I hope you are taking Janet!
ReplyDeleteThe trip to Belgium is for the next meeting of the Colloquium on Money, Power and Print, which you can read all about here: http://www.moneypowerandprint.org/
ReplyDeleteAnd no, Janet won't be going. It's one of those conferences where you spend all your time, meals included, with the conference attendees.