Every now and then a book comes along which while not really saying anything you didn’t know already, rearranges all those bits of knowledge into a new, and fairly interesting, pattern.
Joel Kotkin, The New
Class Conflict is such a book.
Another Christmas gift (this time from my father-in law
(thanks!)).
Here are the bits of information:
1. There is a growing divide in American society (See
Charles Murray’s Coming Apart for the
best description of this divide.) The divide is not solely income based. The divide is also a cultural divide.
2. There is a Dominant View among the opinion-makers of society
(Academia/media) (see any college campus for a good example)
3. There is a lot of new wealth in the Silicon Valley, Seattle
and other Tech hubs.
4. There is a coming generational storm in which the baby
Boomers in their retirement are going to divert a lot of resources away from
the young to the retired (see Social Security)
5. There are imploding cities and sprawling suburbs. (See Detroit and All sorts of second-tier
cities in the US)
Now, rearrange all that stuff.
Kotkin argues that the New divide in America is:
1. On one side there is the Clerisy (the academy and media
and government) and the Tech Oligarchy (The nouveau riche of the Silicon
Age). These two have partnered together
to impose a new order on society. The
new oligarchs are using their money to fund the visions of the Clerisy. In return, the Clerisy vehemently argue against
“the Rich” but somehow the tech Oligarchs always get a pass when talking about the
Rich. Generic Wall Street Banker is bad;
but Steve Jobs is good. But, then in a subtle
shift, the Clerisy also props up the New York Bankers.
2. On the other side is The Yeomanry. This is everyone else. Al those people who, you know, work for a
living. They want a steady job and
enough income to buy a house in the suburbs.
The battle is most vivid in the Environmental debate. On the one side are the Clerisy and their financial
backers in the Tech Oligarchy who want to impose a particular vision on society—no
commuting, small houses. The Clerisy and
tech Oligarchs don’t like the yeomanry.
The yeomanry does not fit their vision of the new society. They want to pack people into those small
living spaces in Big cities and keep them quiet. Think Bread and Circuses. The Yeomanry are constantly rebelling, but it
is hard because the new ruling classes are constantly putting barriers in the way
of that steady job in the suburbs. So,
the Keystone Pipeline or fracking become examples of the divide. On the one side are the Clerisy and tech Oligarchs
who oppose such things. On the other
side are the Yeomanry who support such things because it will give them lots of
jobs and low energy prices and allow them to lead the lives they want to lead.
Meanwhile, the youth are growing up and if those youth do
not end up in the clerisy or the tech oligarchy, where exactly will they
go? Not much hope there. The Middle class is drying up.
Like I said, not much new here, but I had never really put
things together in this way—I had, for example, never really thought about the
Silicon Valley-Clerisy connections before, but Kotkin may be right—they are
aligned.
So, where is the way out?
On this, Kotkin is right—the solution here is economic growth. Without economic growth, there is no way out. The Clerisy does not like Economic
growth. But, how to get economic growth? Kotkin has some fantasies of a return to a
small-scale existence. Think Russell
Kirk or Wendell Berry, but with a growing, dynamic economy. People spread out across the country, all
self-employed, running their own little businesses, being empowered to lead fulfilling
lives, setting their kids up to be richer than their parents. It is a pretty picture in its way. It is also nearly impossible to imagine it happening.
Has Kotkin tried to start a small business in modern day America? Sure, it sounds nice and all. But, it is a giant headache. I know.
My wife has her own small business. She grows plants and sells
them. She does garden consulting. The amount of paperwork and regulations to do
something like that are stunning. In the
four or five years she has done this, I have never ceased to be amazed at all
the little petty tyrannies thrown up by the government which make it just that
much harder to run a small-scale business.
Take the income tax alone.
I have a PhD in economics. Long
ago, I gave up trying to do our taxes by hand, so I bought TurboTax every
year. That was ridiculous. But, then add a new business, and now we hire
an accountant every year just to pay our own income taxes. That’s crazy.
Just plain crazy. And this is,
let me remind you a small business. If Janet
wanted do hire someone to help her out, the paperwork goes up to a whole new level. If she wanted to hire some 17 year old kid at
$10/hour to help out on Saturdays from April through July, the amount of extra
paperwork involved would mean hiring a bookkeeper. Moreover, she sells tomato plants (excellent ones—lots
of great varieties). But, if she were to
also sell, you know, tomatoes—yep, whole new levels of paperwork. She sells perennials (those are the ones that
live for more than a year (yeah, you probably knew that)), but if she sells “woody”
perennials, then, yep, whole new levels of paperwork. We have a farm stand on our property—self-serve,
stop by, get the plants, put the money in the box. Works great.
But, because we have a farm stand and a greenhouse, we had to add a farm
policy to our homeowner’s insurance—and you guessed, it , whole new type of insurance
company—and even better, there is exactly one farm insurance company licensed
to operate in the state of Massachusetts, so we get to pay monopoly rates. And, we added
a shed to store some pots. It had
to be on a temporary foundation or else, you guessed it, we would have had to
go through whole new levels of paperwork to get a building permit in order to add
a shed to store pots. And…well, you get the
point. I could go on like this for hours. And this is a small business.
Kotkin thinks lots of people can set up small businesses—he clearly
hasn’t done the paperwork for one. The Clerisy
has already stamped out that route to self-sufficiency.
So, Kotkin may be onto something in the diagnosis here—the tech
oligarchs and clerisy are operating in tandem to restructure American Society
in their own image. But, I am afraid his
solution isn’t much of a solution.
In the meantime, some things haven’t changed much.
No comments:
Post a Comment