The book: Batman: Knightfall
I stumbled on the series; after the last film in the Christopher
Nolan trilogy, I was curious about the storyline where Bane breaks Batman. Much to my surprise, the volumes containing
the storyline were shockingly cheap on a per page basis. These are three massive volumes for a
relatively low price in the comic-book world.
So, I picked them up, and they have sat on my shelf for quite some
time. You see—they look long. I finally decided I would just do it. It took many months. And now it is done.
What did I learn (besides the fact that you probably don’t want
to replicate my feat)?
1. I feel enormous pity for those who wanted to read this
storyline as it was coming out. In a collected
volume, it is easy—all the parts are there.
But, in the original format, it sprawled all over the place. The problem is that there is not just one
comic book series named “Batman.” Instead, you have 1) Batman, 2) Detective
Comics, 3) Shadow of the Bat, and 4) Legends of the Dark Knight. Then the story also moves through the
spin-off titles 1) Catwoman and 2) Robin. Toss in 1) Showcase ’93 and 2) Vengeance of
Bane. That is a mess.
2. The Bane story, which was, after all, the whole reason I
was interested in this thing in the first place, was a mixed bag—the best part
of the storyline, but a bizarre contradiction in what motivates Bane. Bane fancies himself to be the Supervillain
to End all Supervillains. So, he decides
he must take on the Greatest Hero. He
must Defeat Batman. This diabolical
Supervillain, who is freakishly strong and cunning and certain he could beat
Batman in hand-to-hand combat, does not just head to Gotham and have a showdown. First he causes a major breakout from Arkham
Asylum. That way Batman will be worn out
recapturing the whole panoply of Batman-villains before Bane faces Batman. Then Bane breaks an exhausted, worn-out,
battered, tired, bloodied Batman. Where
is the thrill in that? By the time Bane
beats Batman, I think The Penguin could have taken him down mano-a-mano.
3. Bruce Wayne is thus out of the picture about a third of
the way through this series. But, Gotham
needs a Batman. So he appoints Jean-Paul
Vallery (aka Azrael) to be Batman while Bruce recovers. It takes all of about 10 minutes before
Jean-Paul is totally unhinged, and the new Batman because a marauding,
uber-violent vigilante. This is the
silly season of the storyline—everybody starts wondering what happened to
Batman—the guy has a new costume, acts like a total freak and people are wondering
if this is the same guy? Please.
4. Bruce comes back and beats Jean-Paul to reclaim the Batman
title. Also silly. All Bruce had to do was don his original costume
and keep the raving lunatic from reentering the Batcave. The final confrontation between Bruce and the
Pseudo-Batman ends in a kum-ba-yahesque, imagine we all just get along
moments. Painful.
5. Then we get a
goofy, “Hey! Let’s have Dick Grayson be Batman for a bit” moment—no apparent
reason for that sideshow. Finally at the
end of volume 3, Bruce dons his Batman duds, and the whole seemingly endless sage
is over.
Now, at this point, The Patient Reader is wondering: if this
whole thing is as tedious as it sounds, why did I read it? Indeed, as the Patient Reader often asks, why
does someone who has been known to read a Great Book or Two waste his time on
comic books?
As I have mentioned here before, I am fascinated with the superhero
genre. Even something as long-winded as
this story presents moral problems is sharp relief. The writing in this series isn’t as good as
the writing in the best of comic books. The
art isn’t as good either. But the
central issues lurk. In some ways it is like
reading genre fiction. In other ways it
is like reading second or third rate history or philosophy or whatever. Man cannot live on a steady diet of Faulkner
and Wright and Hesse. Man certainly can’t
live on Piketty (Compared to Piketty, Batman:
Knightfall is pure poetry…and yet nobody ever asks why I read Piketty).
I suppose comic books are a bit like Vanilla Fudge;
sometimes they are great, sometimes they are pale imitations of the originals,
but even at their worst, they are entertaining.
No comments:
Post a Comment